untitled

H.R. 2887 - National EVERIFY bill

NOTE:  The following is information about the national everify bill.  The action alerts are null and void since this bill DOES NOT LOOK like it will make it to the House floor for debate and vote this year.  Clearly this bill was controversial between Enforcement groups because of the states preemption language.

ACTION ALERT !! Thursday, September 22, 2011 ACTION ALERT !!

Call the Capitol Switchboard toll free 877-851-6437 or 866-220-0044 OR directly TX REP RESENTATIVE Gohmert 202-225-3035; TX REPRESENTATIVE Poe 202-225-6565; and PA REPRESENTATIVE Marino 202-225-3731 Ask them WHY they VOTED AGAINST THE AMENDMENT REMOVING THE PREEMPTION LANGUAGE then thank them for screwing us. Email me with the kind of response and attitude you get when you call them nagsusansmith@yahoo.com . THEN CALL YOUR HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE TELL THEM H.R. 2885 REMOVE THE PREEMPTION LANGUAGE OR KILL THE BILL! Nebraska House Reps are Lee Terry, Jeff Fortenberry and Adrian Smith for other states go to www.fairus.org or www.lifelibertyfreedom.com Remove your name and support of NumbersUSA @ immigrationinfo@numbersusa.com AND call them @ 703- 816-8820 to thank them for screwing us too - see my posting on Wednesday, September 21, 2011 for their role in this.

Word has it that TX Louie Gohmert, TX Ted Poe and PA Tom Marino had committed to vote FOR the Amendment taking the language out - but they voted AGAINST it. The Amendment vote... was 16 - 18 The ADVANCING of the bill WITH THE PREEMPTION LANGUAGE was 22-13. Why did the DEMS introduce the amendment and vote FOR it? Because they figured Boehner would NOT mark up the bill if the preemption language was in it - equal to killing the bill. NOW the bill advances to the House floor and it's up to Boehner for a closed rule (meaning no amendments will be allowed) Which is likely. An Open Rule means amendments will be allowed - unlikely to happen. Boehner is questionable. TX - Lamar Smith while introducing the bill ALSO introduced an AG bill that allowed 500,000 immigrant visas. AZ Benjamin Quayle is a McCainite - hoping to take McCain's place when he retires. So there are plenty of snakes in the woodpile.

The reason many conservative activists were willing to push the bill through with the preemption language is for the states who will NOT pass Everify laws. For instance CA has many local Everify requirements but they can't get anything passed at the State level. Unfortunately they are willing to screw the other 25 states who have passed some form of EVERIFY. What they fail to realize is that THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ENFORCE THIS LAW either - so they are screwed and so are the 25 states who have worked their asses off to get something passed.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Federal EVERIFY bill passed the Judiciary Committee today WITH THE STATES PREMPTION language. Now, I've got plenty to say about this fiasco and NUMBERS USA "poison pill" and "open borders" comments and role in this debaucle. Please withdraw your support of donations and remove your name from NumbersUSA. Here is the comment I posted on their FB page - Unbelievable. The only reason it passed the Committee was because the State's PREEMPTION language was in it. Funny this bill was introduced 3 weeks after the Supreme Court upheld AZ SB1070 Everify section. Does anyone other than NumbersUSA believe that BO's administration will enforce this law? After the Ice John Morton Memo and Napolitanos Dept. of Homeland Security DreamAct Policy? THESE PEOPLE do not want state's to have the right to enforce the laws because they know the states will be AGRESSIVE in getting the job done. How sad and how shameful it is of NumbersUSA to mislead and beguile citizens into thinking this language was okay? I'm very disappointed that Roy Beck repeatedly aligned those of us who opposed the language as being in cahouts with the "Open Borders" crowd. When you have the "fathers", the "experts" on opposing illegal immigration and enforcing our laws like Kris Kobach, Lou Barletta, and Daryl Metcalfe saying REMOVE THE PREEMPTION LANGUAGE - it's a pretty safe bet they know what they are talking about! I am withdrawing support of this compromised organization. Activists - Within the next day or two I will have a list of House Reps we need to call to get that preemption language taken out once it is marked for debate and vote. Stay tuned - More on this later.

ACTION ALERT........ACTION ALERT.....CALL TODAY!

CALL HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE to REMOVE STATE PREEMPTION LANGUAGE from or defeat HR2885. FEDERAL EVERIFY BILL. TOLL FREE Captiol Switchboard - 866-220-0044 OR 877-851-6437.........

Kill The State Preemption in the federal E-Verify Bill
http://www.examiner.com/HYPERLINK "http://teapartypatriots.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=378811b3c052d40a005861416&id=013c2fb4cf&e=de21f9eccb"immigration-in-san-francisco/HYPERLINK "http://teapartypatriots.us2.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=378811b3c052d40a005861416&id=2a55e03b4e&e=de21f9eccb"kill-the-state-preemption-the-HYPERLINK "http://teapartypatriots.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=378811b3c052d40a005861416&id=2406a35736&e=de21f9eccb"federal-e-verify-bill

Yadkin Valley Tea Party Documentary can be found here: https://www.yadkinvalleyteaparty.com/Home_Page.php

Link to list of House Judiciary Committee Members: https://rcpt.yousendit.com/1230833376/69806cd15283f11accd5a7c3ee71c6c3

What to do. 1. Call members of the Judiciary Committee. It doesn’t matter whether they are in your district 2. Call your Congressman 3. Write your newspaper, radio station and tv media

A Message From Rick Oltman www.rickoltman.net on the Legal Workforce Act, HR2885 TAKE ACTION! (Call everyone on the Judiciary Committee ask them to remove the preemption clause from this bill TOLL FREE Capitol Switchboard #s 866-220-0044 or 877-851-6437). If the state preemption is signed into law it will represent the biggest setback in immigration enforcement since the corrupt and failed IRCA Amnesty of 1986.

The state preemption, Section 6 is exactly the same in the new bill, HR2885, as in the previous bill. It has not been removed.

The state preemption in HR2164 was opposed by:

Arizona Senator Russell Pearce (Author of AZ’s E-Verify law, SB1070 and other legislation)

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach (Co-author of SB 1070 with Russell Pearce)

U.S. Congressman Lou Barletta (former Mayor of Hazelton Pennsylvania)

NAFBPO-The National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers

Daryl Metcalfe, Rep. Pennsylvania House of Representatives and founder of the State Legislators for Legal Immigration

Bay Buchanan, Co-Chair of Team America PAC. (One of the sharpest political minds in the country.)

Tom Tancredo, Co-Chair of Team America PAC. (Nobody worked harder inside the Beltway for enforcement.)

Phyllis Schlafly, Founder and President of Eagle Forum, (Has impeccable patriot credentials.)

State Legislators for Legal Immigration

Patriot Action Network

http://exm.nr/m2wjEZ

In addition to the state preemption, which open borders activists love, HR2885 has other problems.

The type of documents that can be used to establish work eligibilty have been expanded in HR2885 beyond the I-94 and I-94A to whatever documents "the Secretary" designates. page 4

Fraud Prevention, Section 10 (page 62), has been reduced with the removal of Section C from HR2164. We need more fraud prevention, not less.

The Biometric Pilot Plan that was described in detail in HR2164 has been reduced from seven pages to just one paragraph in HR2885, Section 11 (last page) , which could lead to potential abuses.

There is no reason for the states to be preempted from passing and enforcing their own E-Verify laws, none.

And nobody should trust that the Obama Administration would enforce this law after:

The Morton Memo on Prosecutorial Discretion

The White House Blog announcement on Aug. 19th, which is in effect an amnesty based on the Morton Memo.

Dept of Labor Sec. Hilda Solis announcing that the DOL would be helping illegal aliens and then went on to call deportation as abuse in the workplace

Section 6 - Preemption MUST be removed from this bill or we will have no workplace enforcement in the country. Currently 17 states have their own E-Verify laws in one form or another. With the Supreme Court ruling that Arizona's E-Verify law is legal, by next year we could have 25 - 30 states passing their own laws, especially as illegal alien crime continues to soar in communities and voters begin to demand action from local governments.

 


Report Content · · Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com